EP 401 - Linda Galindo on Why Real Accountability Starts With the Leader | Paper Napkin Wisdom
There is a word that gets used in almost every leadership conversation right now: accountability.
We want more of it from our teams. More of it from our managers. More of it from our kids, our partners, our colleagues, and our organizations. But there is something strange about the way we usually talk about accountability. Most of the time, we are talking about somebody else.
That is what made my conversation with Linda Galindo, founder of The Straight Truth®, so interesting.
Linda has spent decades studying, teaching, writing, and speaking about accountability. Before that, she was a broadcast journalist, and it was actually journalism that led her to the work she has spent the rest of her career doing.
Her Paper Napkin Wisdom was simple:
“‘CULTURE’ is where ACCOUNTABILITY goes to hide.”
That sentence can make you uncomfortable if you let it.
Most organizations talk endlessly about culture. We put values on walls. We create mission statements. We talk about teamwork, excellence, integrity, communication, ownership and accountability.
Then Linda asks a much more difficult question: what actually happens when someone fails to live those values?
That is where culture stops being what is written on the wall and becomes what happens in the room.
Accountability Has to Mean the Same Thing When Things Go Wrong
Linda started her career in broadcast journalism. She loved the work. She had wanted to be in radio news since she was a child and was building a career toward larger markets.
Then one day the sales director at her station looked at her story lineup and told her she could not run one of the stories because it was negative news about an advertiser.
That moment changed something for her.
It forced her to question how decisions were actually being made and who really owned the outcome. Around the same time, she started noticing a pattern in the leaders she covered.
When something went well, ownership was easy. Leaders were happy to say, “We did it,” or, “I led it,” or, “That was our strategy.”
But when things went badly, suddenly accountability became complicated. There were explanations. Departments. Market conditions. Employees. Circumstances. Other people.
Linda started asking what I think is one of the most useful questions in leadership: why would accountability have two different definitions depending on whether the outcome was good or bad?
It shouldn’t.
Personal accountability means the outcome is yours either way. That insight eventually led her out of journalism and into a career devoted to helping leaders understand that accountability is not something we apply only when things go wrong. It is a mindset we carry into the work before the outcome ever arrives.
That distinction matters because accountability is not really tested when everything works. It is tested when it doesn’t.
The Gap Between the Stated Culture and the Real Culture
Most organizations already have enough language about accountability. The problem is the gap between the stated culture and the unstated culture.
The stated culture says, “We value accountability.”
The unstated culture says, “We value accountability as long as it doesn’t make someone uncomfortable.”
We value accountability as long as the person involved isn’t one of our top performers. We value accountability as long as the person being held accountable isn’t politically powerful. We value accountability as long as the manager doesn’t have to have a difficult conversation.
Those two words — as long as — create an enormous hiding place.
Linda described culture as the beliefs, attitudes, practices and policies of a group of people. That definition matters because it pushes us beyond what an organization says about itself and toward what people actually experience.
If a company says accountability is one of its values but repeatedly rewards people for avoiding it, then the real culture is not accountability.
What gets tolerated becomes part of the culture. What gets rescued becomes part of the culture. What gets excused becomes part of the culture.
And what gets rewarded becomes the culture.
Rescue, Fix and Save
One of the most powerful ideas Linda shared was the leadership habit of rescue, fix and save.
Someone fails to deliver. The manager steps in. The manager fixes it. The manager saves the deadline. The organization reaches the goal.
And everyone congratulates the manager for making it happen.
It looks like leadership. Sometimes it even feels like leadership.
But Linda argues that something else has happened underneath the surface. The person who failed to perform has learned that someone else will ultimately carry the consequence, and the manager has been rewarded for rescuing them.
The pattern repeats.
The strongest employees notice it too. They watch a leader repeatedly avoid difficult conversations and redistribute the work of underperformers to the people who consistently deliver.
Eventually those great performers begin asking themselves a reasonable question: why am I carrying somebody else’s accountability?
Linda calls this panic patching instead of future proofing.
The future-proofing conversation sounds very different. It says: you agreed to this. The expectation was clear. It wasn’t met. I’m not going to quietly take the work back. I believe you are capable of doing it. Let’s understand what happened, and let’s make sure the same pattern does not repeat.
That is a much harder conversation.
It is also a much more respectful one.
Linda made a point that I think a lot of leaders need to hear: not holding someone accountable can actually be demeaning, because underneath it we may be communicating, “I don’t believe you are capable of handling this.”
Leaders Have to Stop Protecting the Untouchables
There is another accountability problem that almost every experienced leader has seen: the superstar.
The person produces exceptional numbers but leaves collateral damage everywhere behind them. They are late. They ignore process. They treat people badly. They break the rules. They don’t live the values.
But they produce, so everyone looks the other way.
Linda has a very simple test when she starts working with an organization. She asks the CEO, “Is anybody untouchable here?”
If the answer is yes, she won’t take the engagement.
Think about that.
If accountability applies to everyone except John, or Mary, or the surgeon, or the salesperson who brings in millions of dollars, then accountability isn’t really part of the culture. There is just an asterisk beside it.
Linda used healthcare as an example. Imagine a surgeon who generates enormous revenue but refuses to follow an important safety checklist. The organization’s real values are revealed the moment someone has to decide whether to challenge that surgeon.
The poster on the wall is not the culture.
That moment is the culture.
A Real Team Holds One Another Accountable
Another thing Linda said stopped me. She challenged the way organizations casually use the word team.
A group of people who constantly chase after one another’s unfinished work is not necessarily a team.
A real team holds one another accountable.
People have clear roles. They understand what they own. They have permission to ask questions. They clarify expectations before acting. They do not wait for the manager to police every handoff.
And the leader’s job starts changing.
Instead of constantly fixing problems, the leader removes obstacles, provides resources, handles escalation and makes sure people have what they need to own their roles.
That difference is enormous.
One organization creates dependency on the manager. The other creates capability in the team.
And that connects directly to something we talk about often at Paper Napkin Wisdom: the most effective leaders eventually create environments where they are less needed for the daily execution, not more.
That can be frightening because some leaders have built their identity around being needed. They are the firefighter. The fixer. The person everybody calls.
Linda would say that can become another hiding place for accountability.
If your team becomes truly accountable, some of the hero work disappears.
Then leadership has to become more strategic.
Own. Act On. Answer For.
Linda gives accountability a very practical framework: Own. Act on. Answer for.
Own is responsibility. Act on is empowerment. Answer for is accountability.
That sequence matters.
You cannot answer for something you never really owned, and you cannot own something when expectations are vague.
Linda said something else worth sitting with: the source of conflict is often a missed expectation.
What I thought was going to happen in my head is not what happened out there.
So one of the fastest ways to reduce conflict is clarity.
Who owns this? What does success look like? What authority do you have? What happens if something changes? When will we check in?
Those conversations sometimes feel slower at the beginning, but they dramatically reduce confusion later.
That is also why Linda argues that accountability can actually lower stress rather than increase it.
Most people hear accountability and imagine pressure.
Linda sees something very different.
When expectations are clear, roles are clear and people know what they own, there is less guessing. Less chasing. Less resentment. Less rescuing. Less wondering where you stand.
Clarity does not eliminate difficulty, but it eliminates a lot of unnecessary friction.
The Most Important Accountability Question Might Be This One
Toward the end of our conversation, Linda gave leaders a question that may be worth writing down immediately:
What’s my role in keeping this in place?
That question changes the entire conversation.
Instead of asking why they won’t change, why the team doesn’t take ownership, why managers keep blaming one another, or why you keep having to fix everything, ask what part of the pattern you may be reinforcing.
Maybe you keep rescuing people. Maybe you tolerate missed commitments. Maybe expectations aren’t clear. Maybe you are afraid people won’t like you if you are direct. Maybe you let your highest performer violate standards everyone else has to follow. Maybe you say you want empowered people but continue stepping in every time somebody struggles.
Accountability starts becoming real when leaders stop treating it as something they impose on everybody else.
If you want more accountability around you, start with the accountability available to you.
Clarity Is Kindness
There is a natural fear around accountability.
Leaders worry about being too harsh. Too confrontational. Too demanding.
They want to be liked.
Linda’s response is beautifully simple: clarity is kindness.
Accountability isn’t a stick. It isn’t punishment. It isn’t humiliation.
It is the belief that people are capable of owning what they agreed to do.
Years ago, a friend gave me a napkin that said, “Accountability isn’t a four-letter word, so stop using it like one.”
I’ve never forgotten it.
The highest-performing environments I have experienced aren’t cultures where people are constantly being threatened with accountability. They are cultures where people understand the standard. They know what they own. They trust one another to do their part.
And when somebody misses, they can talk about it.
Not about the person.
To the person.
Linda describes that as one of the behaviours that separates accountable cultures from unaccountable ones. Talk to people, not about them. Stop the meeting after the meeting. Stop rescuing underperformance.
And give people the dignity of believing they can own their work.
Five Key Takeaways
Accountability starts with personal ownership.
It is easy to see where somebody else is not accountable. The harder and more productive question is: what part of this belongs to me? Leaders go first.
Culture is defined by what happens after expectations are missed.
Values written on a wall tell you very little. Watch what happens when a powerful employee breaks a rule, someone misses a target, or a difficult conversation becomes necessary. That is the real culture.
Stop rescuing, fixing and saving.
When leaders consistently absorb the consequences of somebody else’s underperformance, they train people not to own their work. Coach the person. Clarify the expectation. Return the ownership.
Clarity lowers stress.
Accountability becomes threatening when expectations are vague. Clear roles, clear agreements and clear authority eliminate enormous amounts of organizational friction.
5. Ask, “What’s my role in keeping this in place?”
Before blaming the team, the employee, the system or the culture, look for your contribution. That question may reveal the hiding place faster than anything else.
Take Action
Think about one accountability problem in your organization right now.
Do not start with the person who is not performing.
Start with yourself.
Ask what you are tolerating. Ask what you have been fixing for someone else. Ask what expectation you have failed to make clear. Ask where you have created an exception.
Then ask the most important question of all:
What’s my role in keeping this in place?
Change that part first.
Because culture is not something leaders announce.
Culture is what people learn they can expect from one another.
And accountability stops hiding the moment leaders are willing to make those expectations real.
About Linda Galindo
Linda Galindo is the founder of The Straight Truth®, an accountability keynote speaker, C-suite consultant, executive coach and author. Her work focuses on helping leaders and organizations build personal accountability into the way they operate.
She created Accountability That Works!, The Accountability Experience and the Mindset of Accountability Assessment. She is also the author of four books: The 85% Solution, Way to Grow, Where Winners Live, and Accountability Thieves.
Contact Linda
Website: https://lindagalindo.com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thevoiceofaccountability/
X: https://x.com/ruaccountable
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Linda.Galindo.TheVoiceofAccountability
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/StraightTruthGalindo
“‘CULTURE’ is where ACCOUNTABILITY goes to hide.”
Where have you given accountability somewhere to hide?
Comments